[dot]
digraph {
bgcolor=lightblue
a -> b
}
[/dot]
[dot]
digraph {
bgcolor=lightblue
a -> b
a -> c
}
[/dot]
[dot]
digraph {
bgcolor=lightblue
a -> b
a -> c
b -> c
}
[/dot]
[dot]
digraph {
a -> b
}
[/dot]
[dot]
digraph {
a -> b
a -> c
b -> c
}
[/dot]
[dot]
digraph {
a -> b
a -> c
}
[/dot]
Can you include the union of all the graphs in the first layout, but make nodes and edges that show up later “invis” ? Similarly, return nodes and edges that are deleted in later frames to an “invis” state.
Or you might be able to specify a graph width/height that is big enough, but I think you will find that the graph moves around more than necessary with this method.
I’m sorry. This wasn’t meant to be visible for anyone but me.
It’s work in progress on a Discourse Theme Component that will allow users to render graphs and animated transitions between graphs directly in their post here on Discourse. This was an issue I had with it that I wanted to test here.
I thought I had created this new Discourse Development category to be visible only by me, but apparently I failed. Thanks for responding.