# Requesting new Docker images with ghostscript

**URL:** <https://forum.graphviz.org/t/requesting-new-docker-images-with-ghostscript/150>\
**Category:** Dev\
**Created:** [May 31, 2020, 6:49pm UTC](https://forum.graphviz.org/t/requesting-new-docker-images-with-ghostscript/150 "2020-05-31T18:49:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smattr](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/graphviz/user_avatar/forum.graphviz.org/smattr/32/85_2.png) [@smattr](https://forum.graphviz.org/u/smattr)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2020, 3:26am UTC](https://forum.graphviz.org/t/requesting-new-docker-images-with-ghostscript/150/19 "2020-06-02T03:26:14Z")

</div>

I have a preference for CMake, but only because I don’t know autotools well. However, my main concern is that we seem to be maintaining two build systems in parallel. The CMake one seems not tested and, judging by [Stephen’s experience](https://forum.graphviz.org/t/does-anyone-here-know-cmake/135/8), is partially broken. Should we remove it and retain it in a branch for future? It doesn’t feel like we have the resources (or a reason?) to maintain two functioning build systems at once.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.graphviz.org/t/requesting-new-docker-images-with-ghostscript/150)._