# Requesting new Docker images with ghostscript

**URL:** <https://forum.graphviz.org/t/requesting-new-docker-images-with-ghostscript/150>\
**Category:** Dev\
**Created:** [May 31, 2020, 6:49pm UTC](https://forum.graphviz.org/t/requesting-new-docker-images-with-ghostscript/150 "2020-05-31T18:49:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smattr](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/graphviz/user_avatar/forum.graphviz.org/smattr/32/85_2.png) [@smattr](https://forum.graphviz.org/u/smattr)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2020, 12:45am UTC](https://forum.graphviz.org/t/requesting-new-docker-images-with-ghostscript/150/11 "2020-06-02T00:45:13Z")

</div>

Yes, I think I followed this. However, my confusion was that I expected `./configure` to fail if it found something missing that would result in a subsequent `make` failing. Is this just an incorrect assumption on my part?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.graphviz.org/t/requesting-new-docker-images-with-ghostscript/150)._